Ylena In-Albon vs Ziva Falkner Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 03 Jul at 12:47 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
Y. In-Albon vs Z. Falkner

SUI
1
Win
Played
0
Win

SLO
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: In-Albon 1 - 0 Falkner
They have played 3 sets in total, with Ylena In-Albon winning 2 and Ziva Falkner winning 1. The last match between Ylena In-Albon and Ziva Falkner was at the W35 Stuttgart-Vaihingen, 03-07-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Ylena In-Albon getting the victory 6-3 3-6 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| In-Albon | 1 |
| Falkner | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) W35 Stuttgart-Vaihingen(07-03-25)
Y. In-Albon vs Z. Falkner H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $78,893 | Career Prize Money | $1,613 |
| 60.23% (362-239) | Career Total W/L | 54.52% (187-156) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 12 | Titles | 2 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0.00% (0-1) |
Y. In-Albon vs Z. Falkner Match Preview:
- In the last six months, Falkner's second serve points won stand at 37.43%, slightly ahead of In-Albon's 36.13%. Could this slight edge be a determining factor in match predictions?
- Falkner excels in returning second serves, winning 54.85% compared to In-Albon's 50.98%. However, their performance on first serve returns is almost identical, with Falkner at 38.09% and In-Albon at 38.01%.
- Under pressure, Falkner saves 46.76% of breakpoints, a bit better than In-Albon's 44.92%. Does this give Falkner a psychological edge?
- Looking at overall match wins in the past year, Falkner has a 58.97% win rate, notably higher than In-Albon's 50%. Could this consistency suggest a stronger overall game?
- Both players show their best performance on clay, with In-Albon slightly leading, holding a 63% win rate compared to Falkner's 57%.
- Over the last year, Falkner has faced slightly tougher opponents, with an average opponent rank of 337.63, compared to In-Albon's 347.92. Does playing against higher-ranked players give Falkner an added advantage?
- In terms of deciding sets, Falkner is more successful, winning 65% compared to In-Albon's 57% over the last 12 months.
- When converting breakpoints, In-Albon has a slight edge, converting 41.92% of opportunities, just ahead of Falkner's 41.04%.
Editorial Prediction (July 3, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming match between Falkner and In-Albon presents a close competition, with both players showcasing their unique strengths. Falkner has demonstrated a slightly better performance in second serve points and returning second serves, which could play a crucial role in the match dynamic.
While In-Albon holds a slight advantage on clay surfaces, Falkner's consistent match-winning record over the past year cannot be overlooked. Furthermore, Falkner's ability to perform under pressure, as reflected in his breakpoint-saving statistic, might prove critical during pivotal moments in the game.
Considering that Falkner has been competing against higher-ranked players and has shown resilience in deciding sets, the indicators point towards Falkner as the more likely winner for the upcoming match.
Ylena In-Albon vs Ziva Falkner Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
Y. In-Albon vs Z. Falkner H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 15 | Games Won | 12 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 2:41:49 | Average Match Time | 2:41:49 |
| 63% (51/81) | 1st Serve % | 79% (85/108) |
| 47% (24/51) | 1st Serve Win % | 51% (43/85) |
| 47% (14/30) | 2nd Serve Win % | 35% (8/23) |
| 53% (9/17) | Break Pts Won % | 58% (7/12) |
| 53% (57/108) | Return Points Win % | 53% (43/81) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
Y. In-Albon Recent Matches Played
Z. Falkner Recent Matches Played

Y. In-Albon vs Z. Falkner Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60.23% (362/239) | YTD Win/Loss | 54.52% (187/156) |
| 58.34% (787/562) | Sets Win/Loss | 52.26% (404/369) |
| 53.53% (6492/5635) | Games Win/Loss | 51.57% (3675/3451) |
| 56.92% (37/28) | Hard Win/Loss | 47.83% (22/24) |
| 62.83% (289/171) | Clay Win/Loss | 56.77% (151/115) |
| 49.28% (34/35) | Indoor Hard W/L | 45.16% (14/17) |
| 28.57% (2/5) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.09 | Aces Per Game | 0.05 |
| 539 | Aces Total | 182 |
| 0.19 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.22 |
| 1113 | Total Double Faults | 778 |
| 1:30:52 | Average Match Time | 1:35:51 |
| 489.82 | Average Opponent Rank | 477.22 |
| 68% (23783/35111) | 1st Serve % | 68% (13707/20061) |
| 59% (14008/23783) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (7691/13707) |
| 48% (5465/11328) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (2719/6354) |
| 50% (2314/4635) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (1351/2808) |
| 47% (16470/34857) | Return Points Win % | 48% (9726/20190) |
| 21.43% (3/11) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.00% (0/2) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 33.33% (1/2) |
| 18.75% (3/13) | Main Tour W/L | 33.33% (1/2) |
| 61.65% (254/158) | Challenger W/L | 48.33% (101/108) |
| 64.97% (102/55) | Futures W/L | 65.63% (84/44) |
| 60% (352/586) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (183/336) |
| 0% (0/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 49% (46/93) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 47% (30/64) |
| 56% (89/160) | Deciding Set Win % | 64% (58/90) |
| 88% (350/309) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (172/155) |
| 11% (350/40) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 9% (172/16) |
| 21% (250/53) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (171/30) |